lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action


From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: See the new music fonts in action
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:11:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0

Am 26.07.2014 19:52, schrieb Abraham Lee:
Urs,

I'm not familiar with Henle's font or the "Universal Edition" font (other
than the one sample I've seen from you, attached). If you (or someone)
could provide me with some example scores so I know what to look for, I
could give it a go when I've got some time.

I'll send you some examples privately later this day when I'm at the right computer.


Alternatively, if someone with experience (and time) wanted to use
FontForge to put together a glyph set (similar to the Feta set
<http://lilypond.org/doc/2.18/Documentation/notation/the-feta-font>, but
don't worry about the ancient and shape-note noteheads), then I can build
the font files from that. If someone wants to do this, just know that
LilyPond expects the glyphs to be scaled in relation to a 250 em-unit
staff-space. In other words, a 5-line staff is 1000 em-units tall. Don't
worry about positioning the glyphs, just get the right size and I can place
them later.

This is getting exciting!

Regards,
Abraham

P.S. And yes, I plan on integrating examples/samples on
fonts.openlilylib.org so users know what they're getting. Good
recommendation on the stylesheets. What should be the naming convention for
the basic, font only, stylesheet and the other "house-style" ones?

I'd say there should be one stylesheet with the font name and something like "plain", "basic", "pure" or similar as a pre- or suffix.
This will only switch the font without further modifications.
And optionally there should be a second file, e.g. "<font-name>Style.ily" which would additionally change settings that "we" feel to be necessary to make that font look good (i.e. mainly adjustments of line widths, maybe also of horizontal spacing). Finally there _can_ be files making the scores look like something specific, e.g. a publisher or a notation program. But it would depend on each case whether the second and the third are actually necessary or sufficiently different from each other.


P.P.S. You don't like "Amadeus"? I feel rejected :)

Well, it's not that I don't like it, it feels like a good name for a notation font. But it's similarly unappropriate as would be "Finale" or "Sibelius" (you know that Amadeus is an out-of-development but still used notation program?)

I guess I'm okay with
that... What shall we call it? Maybe something to do with SCORE itself or
with Leland Smith (the author)? I'm open to suggestions.

"Schmied"? (German translation for smith, the profession)
"Partitura"? (well, that's obvious ;-) )

Best
Urs



On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

Second comment to this message:

Am 26.07.2014 12:17, schrieb Janek Warchoł:

  Hi,

WOW!! just... wow!

2014-07-26 1:14 GMT+02:00 tisimst <address@hidden>:

All,

I couldn't wait any longer, so here's a formal announcement about the new
music fonts that I've been working on, by way of example. They are all
100%
LilyPond compatible for both PDF and SVG output. They all (except
Gonville)
support the full LilyPond glyph set (up to LilyPond version 2.18.2).

So far, there are now 9 music fonts in addition to LilyPond's default
*Emmentaler* (also called /Feta/ in the official docs). Here's a taste
test:

- *Amadeus* (SCORE look-a-like):

SCORE comparison <https://db.tt/pN6iRsgH>

Can you guess which one is really engraved using SCORE?


Bottom one:
- slurs have different thickness and shape,
- stems and ledgers are thinner than in LilyPond,
- staccato placement on stems differ,
- rest placement in polyphony differs,
- "dim" font is different

Nevertheless, it is very similar :)


I think it would be good to put the stylesheet stuff in openlilylib.
As long as we don't distribute the fonts themselves with LilyPond it seems
strange to provide stylesheets with LilyPond. And having them in the
openlilylib library is still very accessible.

I suggest defining (at least) two "stylesheets" for each font: One which
is simply a shorthand for activating the font(s) and another one providing
additional style adjustments that may be necessary (like Joram
described/implemented in the SMuFL adaptor). Additionally there can be one
or more stylesheets to achieve a certain "house" style.

Having them in openlilylib will also make it easier to improve the styles
collaboratively.

Ah, BTW: What would be absolutely awesome is a font like Henle's notation
font. I would really like to see how such a font would behave together with
Kieren's amazing Henle style sheets.



  - *Cadence* (a tweaked Emmentaler by me):

Grieg's Piano Concerto in A-minor (Adagio) <https://db.tt/icYgT0M3>


Nice!  I'd say that the beams are a tad too thick, but looks good overall.

  - *Gutenberg1939* (old removeable-type style):

Canon in 3 Voices <https://db.tt/RBjSKBLK>


Looks fancy!

  - *Haydn* (like a classic Edition Peters style):

Magnificat <https://db.tt/CX14jc3z>

You can compare this with a commercial version (Kapellmeister) on the
Sibelius Blog from a few months back:

Original Score
<http://www.sibeliusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/
Magnificat-in-D-BWV-243.pdf>
Kapellmeister on Sibelius
<http://www.sibeliusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/
magnificat-Full-Score-dragged.pdf>


"Our" version looks better :D


Definitely! :-)


  In particular, our notehead shape is
much more like the original - although the flags are significantly
differrent.


And the "natural" and dense spacing is significantly better.



  - *LilyJAZZ* (a pseudo-handwritten style, originally by Torsten
Hämmerle):

Crazy Jazz Tests <https://db.tt/T1WwGLiz>

This has been upgraded a bunch, by myself and others, including a
complete
glyph set (notation and text) and updated chord font.


cool!

  - *Paganini* (remapping of Kristof Bastiensen's /Parnassus/, originally
for
MuseScore):

Nalada (Paganini) <https://db.tt/GdyXV0kX>

- *Profondo* (Bravura anyone? This is a remapping of Daniel Spreadbury's
SMuFL-compliant font):

Nalada (Profondo) <https://db.tt/1B9JoPz0>

Compare this with  Bravura in Sibelius
<http://blog.steinberg.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/fibich-bravura.pdf>
  .


It would be great to have the engravings done in the same page layout,
for better comparison.

  - *Ross* (from Ted Ross's famous notation book /The Art of Music
Engraving
and Processing/, and named after him):

Nalada (Ross) <https://db.tt/5uHcypFg>


Hmm.   Somehow this doesn't feel like Ross (although maybe it's
because i've only seen the scans, not the print).  It seems to me that
staves and other lines should be thicker.

  I realize that this is a little like drinking from a fire hose, since
this
has never been done like this before,


indeed!

  but if you're like me, I think you'll
like having lots of choices. These are all properly licensed, so they
will
be free to use, copy, and share!


In all I'd say there are a number of fonts that really give LilyPond a
wide spectrum of styles, while some others are comparably similar (which
doesn't make them less valuable, of course).

Well, _if_ there's going to be an infrastructure to switch notation fonts
in LilyPond, we could consider continuing our effort for a "Universal
Edition" font that we have started.
In that case we wouldn't have any remapping issues, because that's a
modification of Emmentaler itself. But on the other hand it's quite awkward
to work on such a modification in the Metafont sources themselves.



I LOVE IT!!
And i would also love to see a post on Lily blog, and a news item -
this deserves a lot of publicity, it's a major feature IMO!

  If you have any other ideas for music fonts that you'd like to
use/create,
drop me a line and we'll talk :)


As said, a Henle font would be great.



More to come, so stay tuned! Let me know if any of the above links is
broken.


Maybe you should integrate these examples/comparisons in the
fonts.openlilylib.org site?

Best
Urs


We definitely should gather these in some visible place when all the
infrastructure for using these fonts is stable.  I think it actually
deserves to be put on the website!

thanks a ton!
Janek

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]