[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument
From: |
Jan-Peter Voigt |
Subject: |
Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:33:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
... o dear ...
my mail was delayed one day. But thats not too bad, as the other answers
are much more helpful.
Still, wrapped predicates do not get any special handling by th parser.
Cheers, Jan-Peter
On 08.07.2014 13:58, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
> I also stumbled sometimes ove this behaviour, but I think it is not a
> "real" bug. If the parser has a list? predicate, it looks for
> dot-notation. But if it gets a custom predicate, it will not do so.
> Am I right, David?
> IIUC some predefined predicates (list?, string?, ly:duration?,
> ly:pitch?, ...) are handled in a special way to allow shorter input,
> but this is not "seen" by the parser, if they are wrapped in a custom
> predicate.
- Dot-separated list as music function argument, Simon Albrecht, 2014/07/08
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument, Abraham Lee, 2014/07/08
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument, Janek WarchoĊ, 2014/07/08
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument, Thomas Morley, 2014/07/08
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument, David Kastrup, 2014/07/08
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/09
- Re: Dot-separated list as music function argument,
Jan-Peter Voigt <=