[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring
From: |
Jan-Peter Voigt |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 11:37:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 |
Hi Urs and all,
I followed the discussion only roughly, but I think it is a step in the
right direction. I'd like to bring up the scheme-modules, I came up
with. They need a fixed folder-structure and need to be updated
according to the path they are stored in.
Should we have a dedicated folder for scheme-modules or shall we store
them for example in "includes"?
Best, Jan-Peter
Am 05.07.2014 14:28, schrieb Urs Liska:
> Am 05.07.2014 10:31, schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Thanks.
>> I think we will have to reconsider our metadata section and then do the
>> transfer in that "reorganization" branch. I strongly suggest to
>> excusively do that using pull requests, even among the members with push
>> access.
>>
>> One more thing I would suggest to implement is some more standardization
>> for the examples files. These should have formalized headers that are
>> created by pulling in the fields from the definitions file. This should
>> be quite easy to implement: Create one file with the redefinition of
>> \booktitlemarkup and place this somewhere outside the user-accessible
>> files. Then each examples file can simply include this with a relative
>> path and there you go.
>> (-> This implies that our metadata considerations take this into account
>> too)
>>
>
> I have updated the Wiki page
> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/wiki
>
> and added a note about the reorganization process in the README.md on
> the restructuring branch.
>
> Urs
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, (continued)
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/06
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/06
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/07
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/08
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Janek WarchoĊ, 2014/07/20
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/20
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring,
Jan-Peter Voigt <=
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/07
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Jay Anderson, 2014/07/03