[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Digital Edition" conference
From: |
Colin Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: "Digital Edition" conference |
Date: |
Sat, 10 May 2014 14:36:21 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 05/10/2014 03:05 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Hi all,
any LilyPonders or music LaTeXers in Berne or in a reasonable distance
of it?
I'm going to lobby LilyPond and LaTeX at a conference on "Digital
Edition" and could use some argumentative assistance in the audience ;-)
As it happens, I've been invited to present a session on LilyPond at a
symposium of church musicians in July, here in Edmonton. I've been given
a free hand, and thought of presenting the contrast between open and
closed source, where closed environments mean accepting the vendor's
view of what is possible and how to do it, while open source ones are
much more responsive to users. The work done on microtonal notation,
Kievan chant, hymnody, and even David K's work on simplifying access to
the internals, are all signs of a healthy and engaged community, as
opposed to a merchant and customers. Another idea I need to explore is
the approach Janek used to combine git and LilyPond in a collaborative
coding exercise, something I'm not sure is possible with Finale or Sibelius.
I'm also in the tentative early stages of setting up an engraving
business, possibly supplemented with sales of sheet music. I'm expecting
that I'll need to counter the "Everyone uses Finale" argument, so I'll
be following this thread with great interest.
Cheers,
Colin
--
I've learned that you shouldn't go through life with a catcher's mitt on both
hands.
You need to be able to throw something back.
-Maya Angelou, poet (1928- )