Re: [SPAM] Re: Exact stem length?

[Piaras Hoban]

Urs and Fredrik, thanks for input on this -much appreciated.

I'm going to think about stem-distribution for a few days and see if a good solution comes to mind.

Urs you raised the issue of horizontal spacing in the snippet... perhaps just using a very short base duration for the stemmedGlissando will help here?

As for now, I've re-jigged this a bit to make it work more like \afterGrace, as I think they are sisters. 

Overall it should be more robust and it appears more in line with how I usually see these things notated in scores nowadays. 

all best,

piaras

On 26 March 2014 14:45, Fredrik Wallberg <address@hidden> wrote:

Piaras: looks wonderful, thanks for sharing.

>> haven't added it (it shouldn't be too difficult) as I tend to prefer
>> functions that don't have long lists of arguments which I can never
>> remember :)

It is *possible* to have optional arguments with default values:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/scheme-function-definitions
and http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/extending/scheme-function-usage

Though in this case, a wrapper (like Urs suggested) is probably not a bad idea.
My scheme is a bit rusty (actually, it was never that good), but I'm
going to take a closer look at it as soon as I have time.

/ Fredrik

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

repeat-stems-0.2.preview.png
Description: PNG image

repeat-stems-0.2.ly
Description: Binary data