[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature? |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:26:25 +0100 (CET) |
> Found another worthwhile optimization making a difference
> (basically, not discarding and regenerating a blob that is going to
> get analyzed next anyway). In your use case where almost all
> changes happen in the same large file, this does make a bit of a
> difference, in particular regarding the system time (probably mostly
> expended on file reads).
>
> address@hidden:/usr/local/tmp/wortliste$ time ../git/git blame wortliste
> >/dev/null
>
> real 4m18.314s
> user 2m59.460s
> sys 1m16.784s
Impressive!
Werner
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, David Kastrup, 2014/02/02
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/02/26
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/27
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/28
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/02/28
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/02/28
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/02/28
- Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/02/28