[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony')
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony') |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 09:19:57 -0400 |
Dear 'Pond (especially David K),
> I'd like to tie the common notes below:
> {
> <<{a1~}\\{f4 e}>>
> a1
> }
>
> But I'm not sure I'm doing it correctly.
As this is a repeating, repetitive, periodic, cyclical, seasonal, perennial,
regular, frequent, favo(u)rite, and recurrent trope on this list… Is it not
possible — once and for all — to solve the "temporary polyphony" issue?
I believe the consensus, at one point, was that it would be best if Lilypond
(by default) interpreted
<< a \\ b >>
as
<< { \voiceOne a } \\ \new Voice = "2" { \voiceTwo b } >> \oneVoice
The only points of debate were:
1. Should the new voice be explicitly named, and if so what name?; and
2. Is the parser/lexer/whatever in any shape to easily handle this "expansion"
(if I recall correctly, Han-Wen suggested it might be difficult).
What say ye?
If I were a better programmer, with more time, I would try this myself — but
I'm quite happy (as always) to pay for someone else to do it, if the bounty
isn't too high.
Many thanks,
Kieren.
- Ties in complex polyphony, Joshua Nichols, 2013/10/18
- Re: Ties in complex polyphony, Eluze, 2013/10/19
- Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'),
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), David Kastrup, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), David Kastrup, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), David Kastrup, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), David Kastrup, 2013/10/19
- Re: Fix temporary polyphony "for good" (was 'Re: Ties in complex polyphony'), Joshua Nichols, 2013/10/19
Re: Ties in complex polyphony, Urs Liska, 2013/10/20