Re: SMuFL

[David Kastrup]

Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all,
>
>> 3)
>> It's currently not really an option to tackle such a change from the 
>> technical POV.
>> LilyPond is quite far away from being able to play together with other fonts.
>
> From my (perhaps naïve) perspective, this seems to be the chicken
> whence the egg comes.  ;)
>
> Put another way: If we focused on solving #3 — i.e., fixing Lily so
> that she DOES play easily/well/perfectly with other fonts — wouldn't
> we be in a far better position to act on #1 and #2, if it was
> desirable/feasible/acceptable?

By the time #3 is finished, the perspective on the other points might be
clearer.

-- 
David Kastrup