[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two questions
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Two questions |
Date: |
Thu, 02 May 2013 10:08:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
>>>
>>>> In 2.16, you just put the accidental style definition into the
>>>> layout block and that's it.
>>>
>>> Alas, 2.16 is not in Debian as far as I know... I can live with a
>>>
>>> global = {
>>> #(set-accidental-style 'forget)
>>> ...
>>> }
>>>
>>> definition at the moment.
>>
>> <URL:http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=lilypond> shows
>> Lilypond 2.16 in experimental.
>>
>
> Hmmm... I just installed the package 2.16.0 from Debian experimental,
> but it did not help. I had the same error type with a \context {
> \Score accidentalStyle = #'forget }:
Nobody said that 2.16 allows you to invent your own syntax.
It is \accidentalStyle forget or possibly the old #(set-accidental-style
... or whatever it was can be written unchanged in the \layout block.
>
> warning: cannot find property type-check for `accidentalStyle'
> (translation-type?). perhaps a typing error? warning: doing
> assignment anyway"
>
> The \set Score.defaultBarType = #"" mentioned earlier worked, but
> produces error messages:
>
> programming error: Loose column does not have right side to attach
> to. continuing, cross fingers
>
> The \context { \Score defaultBarType = "empty" } worked perfectly.
>
> Moreover, the positions of the bars in 2.16.0 seems to be less optimal
> than in 2.14.2. So I downgraded to 2.14.2 again.
>
> --ghe
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Two questions, (continued)
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, David Kastrup, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, David Kastrup, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, David Kastrup, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, David Kastrup, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, David Kastrup, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01
- Re: Two questions,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/02
- Re: Two questions, ghe, 2013/05/01