[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lyrics interfere with volta?
From: |
Colin Hall |
Subject: |
Re: Lyrics interfere with volta? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:18:30 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.5-dev6; emacs 24.2.1 |
Colin Campbell writes:
> On 13-03-25 03:27 PM, Toine Schreurs wrote:
>>> I'm setting a vocal piece containing a simple repeat. The code below shows
>>> problems with prematurely ending a volta, but only if the Lyrics block is
>>> included. I've trimmed the live version down to this:
>> The lyrics are 'connected' to the "sop" Voice. You only have to specify the
>> lyrics.
>>
>> \new Lyrics { \lyricsto "sop" {
>> gu.
>> Mun --
>> Mun --
>> gu.
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Toine Schreurs
>>
> Thanks, Toine! This at least gets the score readable, although I still
> don't understand the original error.
I'm not adding anything to the solution from Toine, but I wanted to say
that you are not the first person to make this mistake. Todd Hesla had
the exact same problem back in January this year, see:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-01/msg00975.html
In the following discussion it became clear that Todd had followed this
documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/techniques-specific-to-lyrics#lyrics-and-repeats
which is not surprising because the section is entitled "Lyrics and
Repeats".
Phil Holmes clarified things in that thread, quoting Phil:
From my reading of the NR, it's only _necessary_ to add the parallel
"repeat" construct where you want to use \unfoldRepeats and have the
lyrics repeated. As Colin says, I've never done this.
There is a tracker for a design change to take care of this here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3149
but I'm not sure that's the best course. I can't help thinking that it
would be better to just make the docs clearer as this feature of
Lilypond seems to work just fine as it is.
Cheers,
Colin.
--
Colin Hall