[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User comments on R shorthand
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: User comments on R shorthand |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:16:35 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Now look at the output of
> music = { \time 4/4 a1 a1 a1 a1 }
> \new Staff << \music \\ { f1 \time 12/4 f1 f1 f1 } >>
> which is a perfectly valid though slightly capricious LilyPond file.
That is how I join parts together with time changes, and I didn't think I was
being capricious.
If I put the time changes in each part, and make a mistake and forget a measure,
the time changes early on all the parts and its harder to see which part has
the missing measure.
Slip jig time is slightly awkward, but it works.
mandolin = {R2.*4 R4.*12 %{4 measures of 3 beats %} }
conductor = {\time 6/8 s2.*4 \time 9/8 s4.*12}
\new Staff <<\conductor \mandolin >>
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, (continued)
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Raleigh Arnold, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Phil Holmes, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/20
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, David Kastrup, 2013/03/21
- Re: User comments on R shorthand, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/03/21
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Noeck, 2013/03/20
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Olivier Biot, 2013/03/23
Re: User comments on R shorthand, Wilbert Berendsen, 2013/03/24