Re: R shorthand

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi David,

> I gave the answer previously, including the rationale.  Since it was
> tactfully being ignored, it seemed to require more emphasis.  Otherwise
> I would likely have been blamed for ignoring users' wishes in spite of
> them reaching perfect agreement.

So to be perfectly clear: You can see no way to implement any sort of shorthand 
which saves the user having to know (and potentially return to modify, time and 
time again) the "current measure duration"?

Thank you,
Kieren.