|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Guide to Writing Orchestral Scores with Lilypond????? |
Date: | Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:07:05 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
Just for the record: I finally took the time to write to UE again about the issue.I asked for the permission to use the music example (to recall: 4 measures from a Schoenberg score) in a tutorial that is distributed as part of a collection of tutorials. The license should allow to redistribute the text unmodified or modified, but I offered to exclude the _musical_ content from this free license (i.e. allow to redistribute it unmodified and with the appropriate copyright remark).
It took about five minutes to get the reply that they allow this use provided I don't remove their copyright remark and the link to their web site.
Good to know in general, and good to know that I can use the text without having to redo it with a different music example.
Best Urs Am 11.01.2013 20:26, schrieb Daniel Rosen:
-----Original Message----- From: Joseph Rushton Wakeling [mailto:address@hidden Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 6:43 AM To: address@hidden Subject: Re: Guide to Writing Orchestral Scores with Lilypond????? On 01/11/2013 12:44 AM, Urs Liska wrote: I doubt very much that they care about you showing how to re-implement these few bars in a notation program.Don't be so sure. I'm no lawyer either, but from where I sit they were very explicit and specific: the music may be displayed on Urs' homepage, and that's it, period--and since he took the trouble to ask for permission, they may very well check to make sure he complies with that. Sure, they might not think it's worth the bother to bring legal action, but I personally wouldn't want to take the risk, however miniscule it may be. DR _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |