[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question
From: |
Sarah k Alawami |
Subject: |
Re: Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:40:38 -0800 |
I could if I wanted to, how ever Our orchestra are horrible at double stops and
if you have let's say 10 second violins trying to play a double stop you are
asking for trouble so normally we do a divisi, and he I think wants us to try
it. the cello and bass will be easy actually, or shall I say easier. just
octaves.
Tc all. and be blessed.
On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Roland Goretzki <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello list, hello Sarah,
>
> You wrote:
>> I did read that section but this also has some unison parts as well.
>> I'll play with that.
>
> Sorry, but why do You want to use divisi in this peace at all?
> I wonder if You got a view of my example.
>
> Let's see the first bar of all five instruments:
>
> violin_I = \relative c''{
> g4 af g8. f16 ef4
> }
>
> violin_II = \relative c'{
> <c ef>4 <c ef> <b ef>8. d16 c4 % bar 1
> }
>
> viola = \relative c'{
> g af g <ef g>
> }
>
> cello = \relative c{
> c4 f, g <g c>
> }
>
> bass = \relative c,{
> c4 f, g c
> }
>
> As You can see in the violin_II part, the player has to play three times
> two notes at the same time, and after that only 1 note at the same time.
> Playing two notes at the same time occasionally is quite usual for
> violin, so I can't see a reason for divisi.
>
> In the whole peace no instrument needs to play more than two notes at
> the same time.
>
> I think, using the complete structure I gave in my example, You could
> have a real chance to finish this until Monday. :-)
>
> Best Regards Roland
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, (continued)
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/03/03
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, David Kastrup, 2013/03/03
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Sarah k Alawami, 2013/03/03
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Roland Goretzki, 2013/03/03
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Sarah k Alawami, 2013/03/03
- General Relativity (was: divisi parts and another general question), David Kastrup, 2013/03/06
Re: divisi parts and another general question, Sarah k Alawami, 2013/03/02
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Jethro Van Thuyne, 2013/03/02
- Re: divisi parts and another general question, Sarah k Alawami, 2013/03/02
- Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question, Roland Goretzki, 2013/03/02
- Re: Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question,
Sarah k Alawami <=
- Re: Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question, Roland Goretzki, 2013/03/02
- Re: Why divisi? Re: divisi parts and another general question, Sarah k Alawami, 2013/03/02