[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:04:00 +0100 (CET) |
> It is definitely a brainer, as it would require retroactively
> documenting 276 MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACKs. It would take coordinated
> effort to get all of this stuff documented.
And YES, this must be done eventually. Unfortunately, only a person
who is able to understand the code can do that.
Werner
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, (continued)
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, address@hidden, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, David Kastrup, 2013/02/13
- Re: collision beam with staff-crossing beam, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/02/13