[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:20:12 +0100 |
> Well, for example the very first tempo indication should be left-aligned with
> the time signature.
> Lilypond does this [correctly] when the mark is in the Staff context
> containing the time signature, but doesn't when the mark is placed in a
> separate context.
OK, I have never considered that as an issue but now that you say it,
I see that one could prefer it being aligned with time signature.
Thanks for pointing this.
Frédéric
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, (continued)
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, address@hidden, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Thomas Morley, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?,
Frédéric Bron <=
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17