[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial
From: |
Matthew Collett |
Subject: |
Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support] |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:44:47 +1200 |
On 8/06/2012, at 1:54 am, Tim McNamara wrote:
> The first few chapters of SICP would probably be very helpful.
>
> http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-10.html
SICP does for computer programming what Linderholm's classic 'Mathematics Made
Difficult' does for arithmetic -- except that in this case the authors are
entirely serious.
Best wishes,
Matthew
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], (continued)
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/06/10
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], Tim McNamara, 2012/06/07
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/06/07
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], David Kastrup, 2012/06/07
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2012/06/07
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], David Kastrup, 2012/06/07
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support],
Matthew Collett <=
- Re: Scheme syntax vs. other languages [was: Re: Appreciation / Financial support], Vaughan McAlley, 2012/06/08
Re: Appreciation / Financial support, Jonathan Wilkes, 2012/06/01