[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: contemporary accidental style
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: contemporary accidental style |
|
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2012 15:58:14 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Orm Finnendahl writes:
>> \accidentalStyle "neo-modern" does not match your requirements?
>
> its close, but the immediate repetition is the problem. I encounter
> calls by musicians quite often if I don't explicitely restate the
> accidental (even if it's stated in the foreword).
Question is: is neo-modern used and appreciated as it works right now
and do we indeed need a "contemporary" style, or should neo-modern
behave like Orm describes?
Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
Re: contemporary accidental style, Jonas Olson, 2012/05/21