[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is shapeSlur broken?
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: is shapeSlur broken? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 00:50:02 +0200 |
Hi David,
I thought a while about your function.
I'd like to suggest some changes. In the attached file you can see:
- Elimination of `function' as argument of shape-curve and introducing
it as local variable.
- A new condition added in shape-curve at the siblings-variable: ly:spanner?
- In the music-function I added a new variable to specify the grob.
These give the advantage to define only one music-function.
Of course there is need to specify which grob should be applied.
But now it works for all curves:
Slur
PhrasingSlur
Tie
RepeatTie
LaissezVibrerTie
I didn't test it very widly, but what do you think?
Best,
Harm
shaping-curves03-rev.ly
Description: Binary data
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/04
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/08
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/08
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/09
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/09
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Thomas Morley, 2012/05/10
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Nalesnik, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Urs Liska, 2012/05/11
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/05/14
- Re: is shapeSlur broken?, David Kastrup, 2012/05/14