lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with articulate.ly


From: Mark Mathias
Subject: Re: Problem with articulate.ly
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 08:20:50 -0400

Dr. Chubb,

Your comment that an appoggiatura should only be one note seems to disagree with the LilyPond documentation:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/music-glossary/appoggiatura

From my point of view on the Bug Squad, this doesn't appear to be a bug unless perhaps someone feels that the documentation should be revised somehow.

Best Wishes,

Mark
Bug Squad

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Peter Chubb <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Payne <address@hidden> writes:

Nick> The example below builds without error and gives the output I
Nick> want.  However, if I include articulate.ly, then the output is
Nick> garbaged even though I haven't used \unfoldRepeats \articulate,
Nick> and I get the following warnings in the log:

That's because you have a two-note argument to \appogiature.  Use
\grace instead --- an appogiatura should only be one note.  Articulate
changes the default meaning of appoggiatura so the ornament steals
time from the principal note not the preceding note.

Nick> /home/nick/lilypond/examples/test.ly:8:59: warning: already have
Nick> a beam \times 4/6 { a32[( g) fis( g) \appoggiatura { fis16 [ g]
Nick> } a32 g] } warning: cannot end slur warning: unterminated slur

--
Dr Peter Chubb                                  peter.chubb AT nicta.com.au
http://www.ssrg.nicta.com.au          Software Systems Research Group/NICTA

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]