[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:03:57 +0100 |
Hi David,
2012/3/5 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
>>
>> I just finished rewriting the description a moment ago. I'll fix it once
>> the update is through.
>
>
> Anyway, I suppose I should add the file to the conversation. Please look
> through it and see if it's accurate, and I'll take care of adding it when
> the LSR is running 2.14.2.
I've just read the new description. Very nice!
Of course you're aware: doing a good job means that more work of this
kind will be offered. :)
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/31