[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?) |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:58:32 -0500 |
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 11:05 -0800, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> > Open software people tend to consider artists as being
> > equivalent to programmers, so they think artists
> > should starve. I have no sympathy with that view.
> > Obviously. Knowledge should be free, Yale to the
> > contrary. Art shouldn't be free until the artist gets his.
>
> The source code of the lilypond score is not the `music' or even
> `art', so maybe people get confused.
That is true of the program code, but not the data. The
document must carry a copyright notice if it contains
the notes, because it is the composition written in a
form of musical notation. The complete source, published
with a copyright notice, would copyright the piece.
Published without the notice, all copyright would be
lost.
So if you upload the source of a score, see to it that
it doesn't contain the notes. Regards, daveA
--
Guitar teaching materials and original music for all styles and levels.
Site: http://www.openguitar.com (()) eMail: address@hidden
Contact: http://www.openguitar.com/contact.html
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), (continued)
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Raleigh Arnold, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Bernardo Barros, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?),
David Raleigh Arnold <=
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Kastrup, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Raleigh Arnold, 2012/01/20
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Kastrup, 2012/01/20
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Raleigh Arnold, 2012/01/22
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Hans Aberg, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Hayden Muhl, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/19
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/20
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Hans Aberg, 2012/01/17