[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
Tim McNamara |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:12:35 -0500 |
On Aug 18, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Robert Schmaus wrote:
> (I would be amused to know if they'd actually realize if someone did
>> send print/PDF generated by Lilypond...)
>
> I asked them that question, right after reading the mail that started
> this thread. not that I seriously plan to participate, but the obvious
> contradiction in "hand in your compositions printed and as PDF"
> intrigued me to ask them if/how they determine that a submitted score is
> actually produced by Finale/Sibelius. No answer yet ...
Send them a one page sample of Lilypond output and as why that would not be
acceptable.
My guess is the answer is the "prize" of publication- the publisher will likely
want a Finale or Sibelius file. Along with the composer signing away most of
their rights and control over the piece.
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Robert Schmaus, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
Tim McNamara <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/18
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2011/08/19
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Joseph Wakeling, 2011/08/22
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Mike Solomon, 2011/08/22
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/22
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/22
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2011/08/22
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/22
Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/22