[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ossia with signatures where needed
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: ossia with signatures where needed |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:34:32 +0000 |
Hello,
)-----Original Message-----
)From: address@hidden
)[mailto:address@hidden On
)Behalf Of James Harkins
)Sent: 03 August 2011 19:28
)To: Phil Holmes
)Cc: lily-users
)Subject: Re: ossia with signatures where needed
)
)At Wed, 3 Aug 2011 18:39:11 +0100,
)Phil Holmes wrote:
)> If you think it adds information not present in the LSR, please feel
)> free to add it. Note that you will need to change the version
)> statement, AFAIK - the LSR still runs 2.12.2, I believe.
)
)Ah... I hadn't looked at the contributor interface. (BTW, the instruction
)page recommends leaving out \version altogether.)
yes because this is implicit I think when you cut/paste the snippet. It puts
some 'header' information around the snippet and at the moment the LSR is built
on the 2.12.2 code.
It won't hurt to put a version statement in and then comment it out -
especially if it only works on a later version of LP, that will at least help
the LSR people when they come to do the 'upgrade' to 2.1x stable in the near
future.
James
James