[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:25:01 +0200 |
2011/6/22 Markus Pfaff <address@hidden>
>
> Am 21.06.2011 16:16, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> > 2011/6/21 Markus Pfaff<address@hidden>:
> >> A slur from one chord to another is positioned relative to the complete
> >> chord.
> >>
> >> In my opinion this reduces readability of the score.
> >> Shouldn't the slur go from the note inside of the chord
> >> wich it actually starts on to the note which it actually ends on
> >> (from a to bes in attached example for flamenco guitar)?
> >
> > I agree that it should do so in some cases, but i don't think it
> > should do so in all cases.
> > Generally when two chords are slurred, only one slur is used. The
> > problem arises when a mix of slurs and ties appear. In your case it
> > would be best to have the slur attached to the notes that change, but
> > consider this example:
> >
> > \version "2.14.1"
> > \relative c' { \key f \major
> > <c e g c f> (<d f bes d f> )
> > <c e g c f> ( ~<d f bes d f> )
> > }
> >
> > Here only one note is tied and 4 notes are slurred. I'd say that there
> > should be only one slur for the whole chord in this case.
> I agree.
>
> > I think the optimal solution here would be to extend slur syntax so
> > that slurs could be defined inside chords (like ties):
> > <c' ~ g' ( e''> <c' a') d''>
>
> This would be what I'd like to see.
> Would your syntax express one slur (g' to a') or two slurs (g' to a' and e''
> to d'')?
One slur.
> What would happen in this case:
> <c' ~ g' ( e''> <c' a') e''>
> Are e'' and e'' automatically tied or not?
No, they shouldn't be automatically tied.
> The shorthand notation in which only the note slurred into is given instead
> of the complete second chord should also work:
> \version "2.14.1"
> \relative c' { \key f \major
> <a e' a'( des'' e''>8 bes')
> }
> This should lead to a slur between a' and bes'.
Yes, i agree.
However, i see a problem now: it would be difficult to difene what
should happen if more than 1 slur is defined in a chord, for example
<c ( d' ( > < f ) c') > which note should be slurred with which one?
cheers,
Janek
- Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Markus Pfaff, 2011/06/21
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/21
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Markus Pfaff, 2011/06/22
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, David Kastrup, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, David Kastrup, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Bernardo Barros, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Graham Percival, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Bernardo Barros, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Graham Percival, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/26
- Re: Position of slur between two notes in different chords, Graham Percival, 2011/06/26