[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond to Finale :-( |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Jun 2011 12:28:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Shane Brandes <address@hidden> writes:
> The most curious thing about the whole situation was the editor I
> spoke with who was pretty enthusiastic and a supporter of my endeavors
> was also very proud of the fact that he had originally gotten his
> music published because of his exceptionally clean hand. That amused
> me since there is no way a hand written score could compete with the
> output that is now possible,
I disagree. You can capture subtleties of phrasing and meaning into a
handwritten and/or a hand-engraved score that a computer engraver can't
mimic because the information/understanding is just not there. Computer
output tends to score better in a number of categories over manual work,
and score rather awful in categories you did not think of as being even
relevant because "nobody would do that".
--
David Kastrup
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Vuott, 2011/06/04
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Nils, 2011/06/04
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Urs Liska, 2011/06/05
- RE: LilyPond to Finale :-(, James Lowe, 2011/06/05
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Christ van Willegen, 2011/06/05
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Urs Liska, 2011/06/05
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Christ van Willegen, 2011/06/05
- Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, Colin Campbell, 2011/06/05
Re: LilyPond to Finale :-(, David Bobroff, 2011/06/04