[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notation convention: dotted notes, duplet or else?
From: |
Xavier Scheuer |
Subject: |
Re: Notation convention: dotted notes, duplet or else? |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:18:59 +0200 |
On 31 May 2011 20:36, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Yes! For the record, in Lilypond there is an easier way (IMO) to have the
> same outpu:
>
> {
> \time 3/4
> \times 3/2 { c2*1/2 c }
> }
>
Thank you, everyone!
I'll keep proposal 1: dotted notes c4. c4. |
That's what was written on the original score (I'm just arranging this).
At least the musician know a dotted quarter note is equal to three
eighth notes and can [try to] count them, which *could* be more
difficult with a duplet (did I mention it is the viola part ;p ?).
Only this part has this "hemiola feel" and I do not like proposal 4
because it does not show the "symmetry" of these 2 notes having the
same length.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Notation convention: dotted notes, duplet or else?,
Xavier Scheuer <=