[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dot-notehead collision
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Dot-notehead collision |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:20:02 -0000 |
address@hidden wrote Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:59 PM
Perhaps a stupid question - in traditional engraving, is there
ever an instance where, in 2 voice > polyphony, the note column w/
a downward pointing stem is placed to the right of note column
with > an upward pointing stem? I hacked a solution that does
this and it looks much clearer than moving > in the other
direction (see attached). However, if it is not Kosher, I'll
scrub it.
\relative c' { \time 3/4 << { <cis a'>4 <b fis'>2 }
\\ { \once \override Voice . NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #1.25
d2. } >> }
\relative c' { \time 3/4 << { <cis a'>4 <b fis'>2 }
\\ { \once \override Voice . NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #-1.25
d2. } >> }
The upper one is correct, I believe. The real music example in the
Learning Manual shows this in a extract from a Chopin Ballade taken
from a printed publication. See
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/learning/real-music-example
Trevor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers,
Mike
- Dot-notehead collision, address@hidden, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Trevor Daniels, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, address@hidden, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Phil Holmes, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision,
Trevor Daniels <=
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Carl Sorensen, 2011/03/15
- Re: Dot-notehead collision, Nick Payne, 2011/03/15