|
From: | James Lowe |
Subject: | Re: alternative notation for tuplets (idea)? |
Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:08:15 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
Bernado (et al) You can read lots (lots!) here http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/26600 and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/14847/focus=14853 James On 16/10/2010 00:48, Bernardo Barros wrote:
sorry for that. what was the rationale? 2010/10/15 Graham Percival<address@hidden>:On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 04:52:28PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote:2010/10/15 Janek Warchoł<address@hidden>:Hi, an idea about tuplets came to my head (and a quick seach suggested that it wasn't discussed before).It _has_ been discussed before.One think I don't like, since I use a lot of tuplets, is the similarity between "time" and "times". Why not \tuplet 9/8 instead of \times 8/9 ?It _has_ been discussed before. - Graham_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |