lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lilypond vs Score


From: Bobber
Subject: Re: Lilypond vs Score
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:24:44 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090825)

Graham Percival wrote:
Score can do stuff like having the staves in a spiral.  Think of
George Crumb -- if he used any computer engraver, it would be
score.  Score is also not free: it's not open source, and IIRC it
costs $500 or more.

I only saw it briefly a few years ago.  I think our fonts are
better, but score could clearly do more wacky things.  I believe
our input format is much easier, though.
That ability would seem to indicate more possibilities. The person I
spoke to who is one of the publishers listed on the Wikipedia page, said
that the output of both Finale and Lilypond was unacceptable for a
professional publisher. But he did say that the output of Finale could
somehow be manipulated by Score. I don't quite understand how that could
be done but this is what he said.
I can't speak to what major music publishers use.

Cheers,
- Graham

--
Bob Wooldridge
Blog: http://kc0dxf.net/blog/






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]