[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triple stop warnings
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: triple stop warnings |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:46:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:
> Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 08:35:24 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Jay Anderson <address@hidden> writes:
>> > Also for the other responses, sorry if I didn't explain it very well.
>> > This is the only way I've seen triple (and quadruple) stops notated so
>> > I thought it would be self-explanatory.
>>
>> Again: could you explain why you want to write 2. as a duration and then
>> remove the dot manually?
>>
>> This does not really make sense at all.
>
> He does not want to write 2. as a duration. He wants to write the
> whole thing as one chord (It IS displayed and played as one chord),
> where one note has a 4 duration, and the others have a
> 2. duration.
Ah ok, he is removing the dot from the quarter note. Hm.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: triple stop warnings, (continued)
Re: triple stop warnings, Neil Puttock, 2009/12/11
Re: triple stop warnings, Robin Bannister, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, Robin Bannister, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, David Kastrup, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, Philip Potter, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, Jay Anderson, 2009/12/12
Re: triple stop warnings, David Pounder, 2009/12/11