[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem with changePitch,
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: problem with changePitch, |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:00:36 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 03:16:37AM +0100, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Alexander Kobel <address@hidden> wrote:
> > In exchange, I just did the finishing touches on the following two snippets:
> > :-)
> > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=650
> > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=651
> >
> > @ Carl, Valentin:
> > I don't know whom to inquiry with this, but I think the first of those two
> > (split staff indication) could be worth mentioning in the snippet list of
> > the Notation Reference as well, belonging to "Staff notation" and/or "Vocal
> > music".
>
> I'm not sure whether these nice snippets meet the docs writing style
> requirements. I'd tag them as `really_cool' but probably not as
> `docs'... Graham, Carl, thoughts?
What looks bad from the style requirements? I think we might as
well include them. If you see any stylistic problems, just fix
them.
Cheers,
- Graham