[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's wrong?
From: |
Ole Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: what's wrong? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:35:25 +0100 |
Thanks for your help!
Normally I use barline checks- I didn't use Lilypond for a while and was a bit
hasty.
ole
Am 24.11.2009 um 23:32 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer:
> Am Dienstag, 24. November 2009 22:59:26 schrieb Ole Schmidt:
>> Can someone please take a look at my code- it compiles whithout an
>> errorwarning but looks very strange. Maybe I overlooked something simple?
>
> HINT: Sometimes it can be extremely helpful to add some barline
> checks every now and then (actually, in all scores that I write with
> lilypond, I insert a barcheck, i.e. a |, after each and evry measure,
> and a bar number check, i.e. \barNumberCheck #10, every 5 or 10
> measures.
>
> See:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Bars#Bar-and-bar-number-checks
>
> The problem with your score is that you messed up one measure
> somewhere down the line, so that the bar lines would happen
> during notes, so lilypond can't find proper positions to break the
> staves.
>
> Simply try to insert | every few measures and lilypond will immediately
> tell you where the notes don't sum up nicely to these bar lines...
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
>
> PS: I strongly discourage you to structure the lilypond input after the
> original you are copying. In particular, while it might seem much easier
> if you use one line in the lilypond file per music line on your original
> score,
> as soon as you get to the proofreading stage, you'll have trouble finding
> the correct place in the lilypond file if you need to change some notes...
> My advice is to add measure numbers to your original and structure the
> input file by bar numbers. In particular, I usually write exactly one measure
> per line, but for your score it might be easier to write exactly five
> measures
> per line in the lilypond file.
> Since lilypond prints bar numbers in the output, you'll always easily find
> the
> lilypond code that generated a particular note...
>
>
> PS 2: If you really don't find the problem(s) yourself:
> -) Zweite Seite, fünfte Zeile: There is a 8. where an 8 would be correct
> (i.e.
> you have 1/16 too much in that measure)
> -) Dritte Seite, dritte Zeile: I suppose the first ties as should be as4~,
> while
> in your example it takes the duration from the note before (i.e. a half
> note).
> -) Dritte Seite, fünfte Zeile: You write "\times 3/4 ces4 ", which is a
> triplet on
> the ces, not a 3/4 time signature (notice the difference between \times
> and \time...)
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
> * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
> * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
> * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user