[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software
From: |
Thomas Bonte |
Subject: |
Re: quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:24:40 -0700 (PDT) |
Hi Daryna,
There is always the possibility to export your work in MuseScore to MusicXML
and import it in Lilypond. The MusicXML export for MuseScore is very
accurate and I believe Reinhold did a very good job with the import. So
certainly something to try out.
Daryna Baikadamova wrote:
>
> There are many WYSIWIG software capable of opening and saving lilypond
> files, such as MuseScore, Denemo and Canorus. However what are the
> quality of their Lilypond inputs and outputs?
>
> Also when we talk about "quality", we often mean the accuracy, how
> well the features are preserved, and how easy for a *human* to read
> and manually maintain the Lilypond output in the future.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Daryna
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/quality-of-lilypond-outputs-of-different-WYSIWIG-software-tp24793553p25038449.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.