[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:48:02 +1000 |
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 18:45 +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/8/7 Joe Neeman <address@hidden>:
> > How about just checking for an empty extent, like in the attached patch?
>
> That's probably the best option, since it should allow users to take
> advantage of setting X-extent for other barline styles.
>
> extract_grob_set (h, "elements", helts);
> for (vsize k = helts.size (); k--;)
> - if ("" != robust_scm2string (helts[k]->get_property
> ("glyph-name"), ""))
> + // Only non-empty bar lines count.
> + if (h->extent (h, X_AXIS).length () > 0)
> return false;
>
> If you're checking the extent of the BreakAlignGroup itself instead of
> its cause (the BarLine), can't you get rid of the grob set `helts'
> here?
If there's a \bar "" and a clef in the same place, then the
BreakAlignGroup will have a non-empty extent, but I think we still want
the column to be loose.
Joe
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, (continued)
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/02
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/02
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/06
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/08/06
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/06
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Joe Neeman, 2009/08/06
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/09
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Big Measures in Large Ensemble, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/10