[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: website draft 6
|
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
|
Subject: |
Re: website draft 6 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:07:29 +0300 |
2009/7/16 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> Moved to the official server:
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/
> 4) suggestions. Yes, these are still valuable, but we could have
> all the "hey, try out this blue-shaded color scheme" ideas in
> the world. But if nobody is working on the .css file, then
> nothing will happen.
>
> Oh, that reminds me -- the css file. This also counts as #2
> ("writing text files")... if you're willing to edit that file and
> send us new versions of it, we can take care of the git stuff for
> you.
About "hey" and "the css file".
I would suggest to remove any specs from <body> tag:
<body lang="en" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF"
vlink="#800080" alink="#FF0000">
And rely on CSS stylesheet.
CSS sheet says:
body {
/* ... */
background: url(background-image.png) no-repeat top left;
/* ... */
}
And after all i have yellow background ;-)
I mean that my browser has been told to use something
which is close to LemonChiffon (#fffacd) when website specifies
no background color.
So, CSS specification overrides in some way those out in the <body> tag,
but contains no background color. As far as ia understood.
I use Firefox/ubuntu (3.0.11 now).
Probably this is a firefox bug (may be i will check w3c specifications later),
but it would be better in any sense to use CSS stylesheet only, i guess.
> Cheers,
> - Graham
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk