[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?
From: |
David Pounder |
Subject: |
Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten? |
Date: |
Fri, 15 May 2009 19:09:58 +0100 |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Anthony W. Youngman" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Sent: 15.5.09, 18:03:43
> Subject: Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?
>
> In message <address@hidden>, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> writes
> >On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:46:39AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >>
> >> First, I think that the information above should be put into 1.1.1 Writing
> >> Pitches as examples under Relative octave entry. There should be three
> >> separate items/examples:
> >>
> >> When relative blocks are nested, the innermost relative block applies.
> >>
> >> \relative c' { d e f \relative c'' { d e f}}
> >
> >Woah, that's froody! I would have never expected that!
> >
> >> Note: I haven't tested any of these examples.
> >
> >I tested the above, because I just couldn't believe it. Anyway, I
> >agree with these proposals.
> >
> When I first saw Chip's example, my reaction was "why on earth would you
> want to do that?"
>
> As I understand it, \relative converts from note names to absolute
> pitches. Pretty much everything else in lily works on pitches. In a .ly
> file you don't know, on seeing a "c", which c it is - middle, top, low,
> whatever. If it's wrapped in a \relative{}, that assigns a pitch to it.
> Anything else on seeing it assumes it's "c in the bass clef" as that's
> the pitch assigned to the note "c".
>
> So, I don't know how to word it, but when you're talking about \relative
> in the manual it should say that you should only use \relative
> immediately around your note names because it converts note names to
> absolute pitches. If there's another operator inside your \relative (ie
> in Chip's case, a \transpose, in the example above an inner \relative)
> that forces absolute pitches, then the \relative will do nothing because
> it doesn't know what to do with a pitch.
>
> Cheers,
> Wol
> --
> Anthony W. Youngman - address@hidden
>
I don't know if it's worth mentioning, but you can also run into problems using
\repeat inside a \relative block if an \unfoldRepeats is used outside the
block. For example in
Tune = \relative c' { \partial 4 d4 |
\repeat volta 2 { c4 d e g | }
}
the first c will be relative to the last g on the second play through using
\unfoldRepeats. Rewriting as
Tune = { \partial 4 d'4 |
\repeat volta 2 \relative c' { c4 d e g | }
}
resolves the problem. I try to make sure I keep \relatives at the innermost
block for this reason. Is this a case of programming style, and should the docs
cover it?
- Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, (continued)
- Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/05/18
- Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Peter Chubb, 2009/05/18
- Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/05/18
- [PATCH] Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/05/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/05/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/05/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/05/20
Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?,
David Pounder <=
Re: relative mode occasionally gets forgotten?, David Pounder, 2009/05/15