Re: New ConTeXt module

[M Watts]

fiëé visuëlle wrote:
> Am 2009-03-10 um 00:17 schrieb -Eluze:
> > Valentin Villenave wrote:
> > > Perhaps Eluze was mixing up ConTeXt and ConTEXT :-)
> > thanks - how could I ?! I had no idea the other one also exists!
>
> I agree that "context" is a bad choice as a product name, as is 
> "latex"...

Well, if TeX is supposed to be pronounced as "tech", as LaTeX as 
"lay-tech", then I guess ConTeXt is pronounced "con-tech-t", as opposed 
to ConTEXT, which is presumably pronounced normally, but this 
hair-splitting doesn't help when they're written down -- one's eyes tend 
to glaze over aBSuRd capitalisation.