Re: *.mid vs *.midi

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

2008/5/16 Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <address@hidden>:
> Why always speaking about broken OS-es and softwares? We want to make
> LilyPond better, don't we?
> LilyPond generates .midi files, which are not usable for many applications.
> If LilyPond generated .mid files, it would work on every application (except
> LilyPondTool :-), which I think unfortunately depends on .midi).
>
> So I'm sure this is a bug, so it should be fixed.

Hi,

I actually prefer being able to understand file names, and .midi makes
more sense to me.  I think the proper solution is to softcode this, so
we can have a -dmidi-extension=mid, and change the default for the
Windows binary.

Any takers for this?



-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen