Re: scheme function for staccato

[Valentin Villenave]

2008/4/22 Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:

>  The solution in LSR is more or less equivalent to Reinhold's proposal, but
> is divided three separate functions instead of two, whereof two are generic
> and can be used for any articulation.

Yes, it seems more flexible this way.

>  The same fix that I proposed can be used also here, i.e. to replace the
> definition of add-script by
>  #(define (add-script m x)
>   (if
>     (equal? (ly:music-property m 'name) 'EventChord)
>     (set! (ly:music-property m 'elements)
>           (append (ly:music-property m 'elements)
>                    (list (make-script x)))))
>   m)

Great! I've updated the snippet (and my own scores' sources as well ;)

Cheers,
Valentin