[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: \articulation and -\articulation
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: \articulation and -\articulation |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:08:09 -0800 |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> Interesting! However, as this example indicates, it's not
> specific to articulations. We'll add info to LM 3 and
> NR 3 about this.
>
> Since there's nothing specific about articulations here, we'll
> remove it from NR 1.3.
Just to be clear about this:
-- In NR 1.3, we will only be explaining the \ syntax for
articulations and ornamentations.
-- The - syntax will only be explained for the `shorthands'
Is this correct?
Thanks,
Patrick