[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:32:18 -0800 |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:50:33 +0100
John Mandereau <address@hidden> wrote:
> IMHO "quarter-flat/sharp" is non-sense and sounds ugly when speaking
> of quarter-tones, and it looks like from emails in this thread that
> "half-sharp" is rarely used. "quarter-tone flat/sharp" is most
> meaningful and unambiguous, and it definitely closes any debate
> between "quarter-flat" and "half-flat", so I vote for using it in our
> docs; may I change it directly in Git?
No, since did that yesterday. Please always check the latest GDP
docs.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, (continued)
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Trevor Bača, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Graham Percival, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Damian leGassick, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Trevor Bača, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Graham Percival, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, John Mandereau, 2008/01/24
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/01/24
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, John Mandereau, 2008/01/24
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought,
Graham Percival <=