[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: collision, is there a workaround? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:10:27 +0100 |
2008/1/10, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:
> When I try it here, I don't see any difference if I set ragged-right or
> not.
> Note that I have compiled LilyPond myself based on the latest version of
> the source code in GIT, so if it's a very recent bug you may not see it in
> your version.
I have to say I'm a little confused. I have added it as #554, but I
dont really see an obvious collision here (2.11.37). Sure, there seems
to be no white space between the rest and the accidental, but no
overlapping either.
Mats: your minimal example needs ragged-right to be set to true
indeed, otherwise the rest and the note are spread on the whole line
and there is no collision.
Cheers,
Valentin
- collision, is there a workaround?, Ole Schmidt, 2008/01/09
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Damian leGassick, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10