Re: GDP predefined commands

[Mats Bengtsson]

Graham Percival wrote:
> True.  This problem is exacerbated by the fact that I have no clue how 
> the IR is constructed -- if I _did_ understand it, we could probably 
> make a few changes that would make the whole thing considerably easier 
> to read.
>
> However, that's one thing that I'm never going to tackle.  If anybody 
> wants to attempt it, great!  But the IR is officially out of bounds of 
> GDP.
Perhaps you can just send out a wish list, hoping that some Scheme hacker
finds it an interesting project.

  /Mats