[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup
From: |
Peter Terpstra |
Subject: |
Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:22:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.5 |
Neil Puttock in
<address@hidden> :
> The Beam #'positions are based on the original snippet you provided, which
> didn't have the transposing clef. Since the alto notes are now on the
> centre line, the negative values are wrong. Changing them to something
> like #'(1.5. 1.5) fixes this.
Still learning more, thank you very much.
Kind Regards,
Peter
--
mailto:address@hidden
- "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/18
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/18
- Message not available
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Neil Puttock, 2007/08/18
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/18
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/18
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Neil Puttock, 2007/08/18
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/19
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Peter Terpstra, 2007/08/20
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup, Neil Puttock, 2007/08/20
- Re: "Stem #'neutral-direction = #up" versus \stemup,
Peter Terpstra <=