> 2. In lilypond version 2.8 and earlier it was
possible to notate as I'm
> wanting, so the newest lilypond version is a regress
compared with
> earlier versions, and I'm insisting, that this is a bug.
I don't think that lily 2.8 was supposed to do this; it was a fortunate
bug.
Why should *being able* to do something
that ones wants to do (as long as it isn't harmful in some way) be considered
a bug?
I don't, I must admit, remember exactly
what he was trying to do.