Re: DynamicLineSpanner padding

[Mats Bengtsson]

This problem has been discussed before and in the mailing list
archives, you can find some tricks to get the desired alignment
using hidden letters, but I agree that it should be handled
better by default.

  /Mats

Quoting Orm Finnendahl <address@hidden>:

> Hi,
>
> as a follow-up: The same seems to apply for TextSpanners in
> general. In the following example, the baselines of the s.t. and
> s.p. aren't aligned either:
>
> \override TextSpanner #'edge-text = #'("s.t." . "  s.p.")
> f2~ \startTextSpan  f2 \stopTextSpan  |
>
> It looks pretty bad and the only fix in this case is to use empty
> spaces for the edge textes and then do simple text markup, shifting
> the text around with padding, which is unlikely to be the purpose of
> the "edge-text" property.
>
> Should I file that as a bug report somewhere?
>
> --
> Orm
>
>
> Am 02. Dezember 2006, 17:02 Uhr (+0100) schrieb Orm Finnendahl:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I observed a nasty behaviour trying to set the #'padding property of
> > the DynamicLineSpanner: The \p and \pp are not baseline-aligned with
> > the \ff or \mf.
> >
> > Has this been reported before? To me this looks like something which
> > should rather get corrected in lilypond itself than cluttering the
> > script with different padding values before and after each \pp.
> >
> > --
> > Orm
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user