[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triangle chord notation
From: |
joelinux |
Subject: |
Re: triangle chord notation |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:57:25 -0600 (GMT-06:00) |
There is a b# note; but for all practical purposes no B#7 chord.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Stewart Holmes <address@hidden>
>Sent: Aug 4, 2006 3:36 PM
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: triangle chord notation
>
>> Academics poison the well when they use the system for analysis, which is
>> a purpose for which it was never intended. Do not follow the
>> innovations suggested by academic articles. It leads to such abominations
>> as the flat13th chord or the B#7, which is better written C7, regardless
>> of a big fat bis being in the score.
>
>I think there comes a point when the line between ease of playability &
>musical correctness start to overlap. Personally, I think that writing B# as
>C for ease of reading is just incorrect. I see where you're coming from, but
>I think this is a compromise too far.
>
>Stewart
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: triangle chord notation, (continued)
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/08
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/08
Re: triangle chord notation,
joelinux <=
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/13