[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Questions from a Wanderer Returning
From: |
Alan McConnell |
Subject: |
Questions from a Wanderer Returning |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2006 05:59:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Assembled Wisdom!
I used lilypond several years ago, but had a lot of trouble
upgrading, because then one had to build from scratch and there
were always guile imcompatibilities, etc. So I did nothing with
computer music typesetting for quite a while.
I recently did a reinstall of a very ancient Linux system and
am now running Debian Sarge; and I reinstalled Lilypond from
the CDs I bought. So I now have Lilypond 2.2.6. Which I guess
is ancient, but I still was able to set a transcription of
some Bach for string quartet.
So much for preface. I have three questions:
1. If I want to upgrade to a Lilypond 2.6.x, will that mean
I have to get a new guile, and possibly other libs?
2. I have been poking about in the lilypond fonts; I have displayed
most of the feta* fonts. But I can't find the more fundamental fonts,
with note shapes, stems and flags; are they in the TeX hierarcy
somewhere? [ Reason for asking: I have the occasion to make a couple
of two-bar corrections to some cello parts, and I want the staff lines
and the bar lines to be _exact_ so that I can glue in the
replacements. I thought I would try making a TeX file that would do
that; just as an exercise<g]
3. Mats Bengtsson wrote in a recent E-mail: "Note that version 2.6 and
later don't know anything about TeX or LaTeX." I don't know what he
meant by that; doesn't even today's Lilypond use TeX for its
engraving? isn't the last stage of the "lilypond -P" command still
"running dvips . . ."?
TIA for clarification/assistance.
Alan McConnell
--
Alan McConnell : http://patriot.net/users/alan
"The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
Impeachment proceedings should be started immediately.