[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Does what: \override Slur #'attachment = #'(stem . stem)
From: |
Fairchild |
Subject: |
RE: Does what: \override Slur #'attachment = #'(stem . stem) |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:04:13 -0600 |
Tried:
\override Slur #'positions = #'(stem . head)
\override Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
\override Score.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
\override Voice.Slur #'positions = #'( 13.0 . -13.0 )
\override Slur #'positions = #'(( 13.0 . -13.0 ) ( 4.0 . 4.0 ))
to no effect, not even errors.
Tell me more.
-----Original Message-----
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 12:16 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Does what: \override Slur #'attachment = #'(stem . stem)
Fairchild wrote:
> Sure do miss the "\override Slur #'attachment = " feature in v 2.4.6.
> Using "\override Slur #'control-points = " as a workaround is tedious.
> Don't want to upgrade beyond 2.4.6 yet.
>
> Is there a better workaround or a way to patch in the missing Scheme
> code?
why don't you use #'positions ?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen